Talk:Lamborghini Diablo – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

5 Apr 2015 | Author: | Comments Off on Talk:Lamborghini Diablo – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Lamborghini Diablo

Talk:Lamborghini Diablo

Cleanup needed [ edit ]

I’m working hard on P924 CarreraGTS (talk ) 30 June 2010 (UTC)

I little interest in this but this article is in need of and punctuation help. Russell 15 September 2005 (UTC)

by someone else: I changed the of the Millenium Roadsters. It said were rear wheel I have owned a VT all wheel Millenium Roadster. The carbon spoiler was optional and is only on a few, select Millenium

It says the diablo was AWD. isn’t true is it? I know the models were RWD and can’t the eralier ones as AWD. I want to edit it as I am not 100% (more into small than exotics), and I don’t an account – don’t my IP blocked —Preceding unsigned added by 69.253.53.115 (talk • ) 6 December 2006

Posted by else from here on (I figure out how to make my own post, Its actually generally the later that weren’t RWD since took over in 1996. the VT has always been AWD/4WD (I no idea what the difference is if is one!) and perhaps the only Diablo (I’m not sure!) began to produce more of VT (i.e. the VT 6.0, VT 6.0 SE and the VT Millenium as well as the previously made VT and VT because of their stupid about sensible 4WD being than the more dangerous yet more thrilling RWD mainly due to the factor!

Now all Lamborghinis made are AWD/4WD and that’s thanks to Audi who Audified the entire Lamborghini range in probably every Oh well, at least Lamborghini able to produce the Diablo Jota before it all went

U.S. Market Variations [ ]

I think we might want to out that Diablo models somewhat different in the United vs. Rest of World. Aside the cosmetic differences, not all models the GT) reached American shores. As far as I (and correct me if I’m the U.S. model list like this (years are YEARS):

1991-1993: Diablo coupe only)

1994: SE coupe, VT coupe

1995: VT coupe only

1996: VT coupe, VT Roadster

1997: VT Roadster only

1998: SV coupe, SV Monterey coupe, VT

1999: Diablo VT Roadster (Mk 2), SV (Mk 2), MOMO Roadster (12 built), VT coupe (12 built)

2000: Millennium Roadster, 6.0 VT??

2001: Diablo 6.0 VT only

right? Sacxpert 15:42, 17 2006 (UTC)

If you can find kind of reference to corroborate list there’s no reason why it go into the article. User:Jaganath 21 August 2006 (UTC)

not sure on the year but there was a Package as well (VT Twin only 6 or 7 were originally more info here:

Images [ edit ]

I want to a car todaay, and I added about or five images I created of variants. Karrmann 18:55, 17 2007 (UTC)

Reply: editing this page you do not have any knowledge about car. Stop posting quality photos and also posting wrong info on the

Very poor [ edit ]

page is of a very poor in my opinion. It needs definitely clean up. There are really a lot of in it and it looks terrible.

I will some major changes in a of weeks when I have DiabloSE30

until someone provided a better rear of the Diablo, I will continue of the picture. The picture gives the of a picture of what the Diablo’s looks like. and please your name. Jpogi 23 June 2007 (UTC)

And you need to stop adding use images to this article. are pleanty free use images of the readilly available, so a fair use is unacceptiable. And the images are not poor, adquitely show the details of the appearance.

Keep in mind on WIkipedia, images are only to show a cars appearance, are not supposed to make the car look nor bad. Karrmann 14:14, 23 2007 (UTC) The pictures the readers of the different Diablos of different colors) that released; whether the picture are of quality or not. Jpogi 23 June 2007 (UTC) The are of adiquete quality.

He must that any image that glorify the car is poor quality. 14:51, 23 June 2007 I’ll go with karrmann in the pictures. I’m also of putting back the gallery.

make sure that that se30 opens article, he’ll/she’ll find out the pictures are still there. 15:34, 23 June 2007

Copyright violation? [ edit ]

The text on the Diablo GTR is word for taken from http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/car/635/Lamborghini-Diablo-GTR.html and to come from a Lamborghini kit. Is this a copyright then, or can one assume that a handed out to the press for the express of publication falls under regulations? — At least bad style by the author to quote giving the source. –328cia ) 21:01, 16 April 2008

100% agreed. sadly, of this entire page was and pasted from various Maybe not quite word for but using copy and paste and altering a few words is still by most accounts. I have pretty much the entire in a precis format so I think directly lifted info no longer be an issue. CheersP924 (talk ) 15:11, 9 July (UTC)

rubbish infomation [ ]

The Diablo wasn’t the first car to go the 200mph barrier. The Ferrari F40 201mph which IS faster The Diablo went 202.33mph to the American car magazine ‘Road and which tested the original

This page is rubbish and so is the

Lamborghini Diablo

rubbish infomation [ edit ]

The wasn’t the first car to go over the barrier. The Ferrari F40 went which IS faster 200mph. The went 202.33mph according to the car magazine ‘Road and Track’ tested the original car. page is rubbish and so is the information. unsigned comment added by (talk ) 10:43, 25 May 2010

Merger Proposal (Closed) [ ]

Article merged: See old talk-page

Page has been merged, is underway.P924 CarreraGTS (talk ) 6 July 2010 (UTC)

I proposed to merge the article Diablo GT with this

The reasoning is simple: The Diablo GT is the Diablo variant with its own and there is simply no need for It doesn’t even have a This page should be an description of all Diablo variants of P924 CarreraGTS (talk ) 30 June 2010 (UTC)

[ edit ]

I believe I have my exhaustive re-working of this It was undeniably bad to begin with, a great deal of spurious fragments and poorly written and serious amounts of direct-lift which I consider to be a copyright I added a lot of omitted information, the page to a universal format, converted units as appropriate, and some informative tables. citations have been throughout the article.

I realize, that I used a GREAT of information from lambocars.com, might seem like a monopoly that could false information, but there are not a lot of reputable web sources on this I would have to hit the books in to refine it any further, as the other I visited were just as as this article was to begin

I will be keeping a close eye on page to monitor vandalism or inaccurate additions. Finally, I that this article may now be for a better than B-class

File:Gt55.jpg Nominated for Deletion [ ]

An image used in this File:Gt55.jpg. has been nominated for at Wikimedia Commons in the following Media without a source as of 19 2011 What should I do?

panic ; a discussion will now place over on Commons whether to remove the file. gives you an opportunity to contest the although please review guidelines before doing so.

If the is non-free then you may need to it to Wikipedia (Commons does not fair use)

If the image freely licensed and there is no use rationale then it cannot be or used.

1999-2001 Diablo a generation or facelift? [ edit ]

Is the Diablo using the same as the 1990-1998 Diablo? If yes, a facelift, but if no, it could be second WKB (talk here /This is not nor Malaysia ) 00:37, 30 November (UTC)

Fastest in the world [ edit ]

Lamborghini Diablo
Lamborghini Diablo
Lamborghini Diablo
Tagged as:

Other articles of the category "Lamborghini":

Twitter-news
Our partners
Follow us
Contact us
Our contacts

dima911@gmail.com

Born in the USSR

423360519

About this site

For all questions about advertising, please contact listed on the site.


Car Catalog with specifications, pictures, ratings, reviews and discusssions about cars