2009 Subaru Forester Review

1 Jan 2015 | Author: | Comments Off on 2009 Subaru Forester Review

2009 Subaru Forester

The Subaru Forester is a full redesign for 2009 that brings with it a higher stance, a longer wheelbase and a larger cabin. This increased size and new styling place it squarely in the compact SUV mainstream, addressing two former criticisms — a non-SUV-like appearance and cramped passenger space, especially in the rear. While the Forester’s new look is intended to bring it closer to other small SUV favorites, not everyone sees that as a good thing.

The New York Times’ Chris Jensen calls it generic and laments, Now it looks like everything but the Forester.

Overall, however, critics have responded to the changes favorably. The 2009 Subaru Forester took the SUV of the Year title at Motor Trend, a Top Family Vehicle award at MotherProof.com, and was a finalist for the 2009 International Car and Truck of The Year award. The Subaru Forester was also declared Best Redesigned Vehicle by the editors of Kelley Blue Book.

In a three-way review at Motor Trend of the Subaru Forester against the Volkswagen Tiguan and the midsize Mazda CX-7 (all three models had turbo four-cylinder engines), editors found the Subaru Forester to be the quickest to 60 mph, the fastest in the quarter mile and the most fuel-efficient vehicle of the bunch. You have to be impressed with what you get for the money, says Motor Trend’s Arthur St. Antoine.

MotherProof.com’s Emily Hansen praises the Subaru Forester’s fuel economy, low price and good safety scores, but wishes Subaru had thought to offer a power tailgate (a feature usually found on midsize and larger SUVs) option on its small SUV. Edmunds.com describes the new Forester as being more SUV-like and useful now that it’s been redesigned, but editors still call out the Forester’s handling capabilities, saying that winding roads throw its soft suspension for a loop. Still, the Subaru is deemed more maneuverable than competition from Toyota and Honda thanks to a tighter turning circle, according to editors at Edmunds.com’s enthusiast website, Inside Line.

One particularly glaring source of criticism is the Subaru Forester’s four-speed automatic transmission — standard on turbocharged models and optional with the base engine. Most critics consider the four-speed outdated compared to the offerings in competing small SUVs. The Honda CR-V (*est. $21,245 to $27,245), for example, features a five-speed automatic in all models as standard equipment.

Inside Line’s Kelly Toepke calls the four-speed automatic an unfortunate hand-me-down from the Impreza sedan that no longer seems to offer the speed or fuel economy we expect.

For 2009, the Subaru Forester’s interior closely resembles that of the Subaru Impreza sedan and hatchback (covered in our report on economy cars). Edmunds Inside Line likes it, saying that apparent quality has improved and that Subaru now has a surer sense of interior style than either Nissan or Toyota. The unapologetic reviewers at TheTruthAboutCars.com don’t mince words in their criticism, however.

Reviewer Michael Karesh calls the 2009 Subaru Forester’s interior a lethal combo of upmarket aspirations and cheap materials, and Megan Benoit follows up in a second review of a turbo model, saying the ridiculously low front seats give occupants a nice view of the dash, hood scoop and little else. Karesh applauds the Forester’s copious legroom, reclining rear seat, and abundant storage cubbies, though.

Cars.com’s Kelsey Mays is more measured in his criticism, saying, Interior quality is good, if occasionally inconsistent and he points out that some materials do seem cheap, but that controls that will see consistent use feel sturdy. Mays also comments that the Subaru Forester‘s high dashboard creates the impression of a low driving position but notes that outward visibility is excellent. Cars.com also points out that to get a telescoping steering wheel, you have to buy the more expensive turbo model — the steering column in the base-engine Subaru Forester only tilts up and down.

The Subaru Forester seats five, and thanks to the updated longer wheelbase (the distance measured between the centers of the front and rear wheels), there’s now more room in the back seats, addressing a prior complaint. Up front, the Subaru Forester offers more legroom than either the Toyota RAV4 (*est. $21,500 to $27,810) or the Honda CR-V.

A wider tailgate opening and low cargo floor make the Forester easy to fill with cargo, but dimensionally it doesn’t offer as much hauling capacity (in cubic feet) as the other small SUV class leaders. Critics don’t hold this against the Subaru Forester, though, since its easy-to-use packaging (swing-up tailgate, fold-flat second-row seats) offers advantages over the Toyota RAV4’s side-hinged cargo door and the Honda CR-V’s clunkier second-row fold-and-tumble seats. In addition, there are some hidden storage cubbies tucked under the Subaru Forester‘s rear cargo floor.

The Subaru Forester is only available with all-wheel drive, and its AWD system doesn’t include a transfer case or the low-range gearing considered essential for serious off-road driving. However, the Forester’s chassis provides almost 9 inches of ground clearance, as well as good approach and departure angles, making it more capable off road than most other all-wheel-drive compact SUVs. In the Motor Trend comparison, the Subaru Forester fared better in the dirt than both the Mazda CX-7 and Volkswagen Tiguan.

A horizontally opposed four-cylinder engine displacing 2.5-liters is used in every Subaru Forester. The base version of this engine has 170 horsepower, while an optional turbocharged variant with 224 horsepower is also available. Drivers who opt for the standard engine in this small SUV are offered a choice of either a five-speed manual or a four-speed automatic transmission.

Turbocharged Subaru Foresters, on the other hand, are restricted to the four-speed automatic.

Fuel economy in the Subaru Forester is respectable. Turbos require premium fuel and get about 21 mpg in mixed driving (19 mpg city and 24 mpg highway), according to Environmental Protection Agency fuel-economy estimates. The standard 2.5-liter engine does a little better: 22 mpg in combined use (20 mpg city and 27 mpg highway with the manual; 20 mpg city and 26 mpg highway with the automatic) These mileage figures are at the high end of the range for compact SUVs, and nearly equal to those of the all-wheel-drive Honda CR-V.

A full complement of safety features is standard with the 2009 Subaru Forester, including stability and traction control systems; antilock brakes; front and rear side curtain airbags; and front-seat side airbags. It performs well in government crash tests as well as those conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), which names the Forester a 2009 Top Safety Pick.

Since the 2009 Subaru Forester is a new model, there was no shortage of good reviews to refer to. Motor Trend and Truck Trend each subjected the Forester to comparison tests with other small SUVs. We also read detailed reports on the 2009 Subaru Forester at Edmunds.com, MotherProof.com and ConsumerGuide.com.

ConsumerReports.org provides a complete review of the new 2009 model, but it’s behind a subscribers-only wall.

Tagged as:

Other articles of the category "Subaru":

Our partners
Follow us
Contact us
Our contacts


Born in the USSR


About this site

For all questions about advertising, please contact listed on the site.

Car Catalog with specifications, pictures, ratings, reviews and discusssions about cars